Comments on: The YALID Syndrome http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/2009/12/30/the-yalid-syndrome/ Science, technology and science fiction/Fantasy Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:54:00 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: lurker http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/2009/12/30/the-yalid-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-160 lurker Tue, 25 May 2010 18:53:19 +0000 http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/?p=305#comment-160 Well, Tim, the blog in question was a "community" of individual blogs, and I believe the individual blogger had no say in the policy, so I let him off that particular hook. Well, Tim, the blog in question was a “community” of individual blogs, and I believe the individual blogger had no say in the policy, so I let him off that particular hook.

]]> By: tim callender http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/2009/12/30/the-yalid-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-159 tim callender Tue, 25 May 2010 14:58:53 +0000 http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/?p=305#comment-159 If I have to join in order to leave a comment, that tells me the person in charge of the blog (forum, board, whatever) really isn't interested in what I have to say. So I just shrug and go on to the next thing. If I have to join in order to leave a comment, that tells me the person in charge of the blog (forum, board, whatever) really isn’t interested in what I have to say. So I just shrug and go on to the next thing.

]]> By: lurker http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/2009/12/30/the-yalid-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-153 lurker Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:51:08 +0000 http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/?p=305#comment-153 Yes, that would be one way aroun it - I will have to see how that fits me, thanks for your consideration Yes, that would be one way aroun it – I will have to see how that fits me, thanks for your consideration

]]> By: RedEyeSky http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/2009/12/30/the-yalid-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-152 RedEyeSky Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:28:08 +0000 http://www.babylonlurker.net/blog/?p=305#comment-152 My timesaver is to have a class of things that don't require mega-secure logins, like the blogs etc you mentioned, is to use the first 5 letters in the name of the blog, site etc and then have a "PIN" - 4 letters/digits that are not a word, and are fairly random - which I append to my log-ins. So, your would say be babyl5ttL, where 8GpL was my "PIN" - which it isn't of course! Not ideal, and agree they're a faff, but a format like that can save time as you only need recall your "PIN". My timesaver is to have a class of things that don’t require mega-secure logins, like the blogs etc you mentioned, is to use the first 5 letters in the name of the blog, site etc and then have a “PIN” – 4 letters/digits that are not a word, and are fairly random – which I append to my log-ins.

So, your would say be babyl5ttL, where 8GpL was my “PIN” – which it isn’t of course!

Not ideal, and agree they’re a faff, but a format like that can save time as you only need recall your “PIN”.

]]>